tactical biopolitics book review

Marcie Bianco of Feminist Review writes about the new book ‘Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience’, Edited by Beatriz da Costa and Kavita Philip, MIT Press. She notes that

‘The essay on subRosa’s subversive practices that intertwine art, biology, and politics nicely encapsulates the empowering, activist tone of’

the book.


Blog Project

This blog is a personal site (contact info at the about me page) linked to Dphil research project ‘New media, new feminisms? Networking for Contemporary Queer and Feminist Activism in UK (and beyond)’, which commenced in October 2008. It will publish comments, news and resources as the Research evolves. It also aims to be a meeting place with the groups and individuals that participate in the study. Finally, it functions as a journal of the research process. My primary goal at the moment is to set up a name index containing Feminists divided in the following broad sections: Academics, Activists, Artists, Collectives, Journalists. This will be placed at separate page(s) in the blog.

Thesis abstract

at this point-

The project refers to the use of new technologies for the production and circulation of activist media by contemporary queer/ feminist activists in

Britain. The focus is on new networking conditions

created by new media and their incorporation by feminist/ queer activists. I am interested in how the experience of producing ephemeral media

with new technologies is different from earlier forms,

for example zines, and, in particular, how the capability of digital archiving and sharing shapes production attitudes, form and content.

Moreover, I aim to understand how activists interact with

commercial media strategies like advertising. What kind of cultural capital and media literacy is needed by activists and to what

cultural/political collective memories do they speak? My corpus

is the work of groups and individuals, their attitudes and practices. By exploring networking conditions of media production,

eventually I ask: do they signify the emergence of ‘new feminisms’?